Attendance Monitoring with Payroll System

Participation MONITORING WITH PAYROLL SYSTEM FOR CYCLEMAR CALOOCAN CORPORATION A System Analysis and Design Project Presented to Quezon City Polytechnic University San Bartolome In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Information Technology by: Tahum, Marilyn T. Desuyo, Gilbert D. Co, Joseph Darwin C. Lim, Tom Angel L. Teacher : Mary Joy D. Vinas Professor : Elimar Ravina October 2011 SAD COORDINATOR AND IS’s HEAD ACCEPTANCE SHEET This System Analysis and Design Project entitled ATTENDANCE MONITORING WITH PAYROLL SYSTEM FOR CYCLEMAR CALOOCAN CORPORATION In the wake of having been suggested and affirmed is thusly acknowledged by the Information innovation Department of Quezon City Polytechnic University †San Bartolome ______________________ Ms. Lorena A. Tayamora SAD Coordinator ______________________ Ms. Maria Aura Impang IS Head October 3, 2011 PANEL’S APPROVAL SHEET This System Analysis and Design Project entitled ATTENDANCE MONITORING WITH PAYROLL SYSTEM FOR CYCLEMAR CALOOCAN CORPORATION created by: Desuyo, Gilbert D. Co, Joseph Darwin C. Lim, Tom Angel L. Tahum, Marilyn T. subsequent to having been introduced is thusly affirmed y the accompanying individuals from the board _____________________________________ Panelist October 3, 2011 October 3, 2011 ______________________ Lead Panelist October 3, 2011 Acknowledgment Above every one of, the advocates might want to thank the consistently cherishing God for giving them the astuteness and persistence to complete this exploration. The scientists might want to offer their sincerest thanks to their folks for their untiring help genuinely and monetarily. The advocates are likewise grateful to Professor Mary Joy D. Vinas for altering the primary, second and third parts of this exploration. Extraordinary gratitude to their folks, and companions who bolstered them. The defenders might want to stretch out their thankfulness to Cyclemar Caloocan Corporation who energetically coordinates for the said examination. To their colleagues who have given full help and confirmation, thank you for your time and exertion. To all the individuals who have been the instruments for the achievement of this exploration, much thanks!!! Unique Title:â€Å"ATTENDANCE MONITORING WITH PAYROLL SYSTEM† Proponents: GILBERT D. DESUYO JOSEPH DARWIN C. CO TOM ANGEL L. LIM MARILYN TAHUM Professor: Prof. Mary Joy Daniel Vinas Prof. Elimar Ravina Degree: Bachelor of Science in Information Technology Date Completed: October 2011 Statement of the Problem The CYCLEMAR CALOOCAN CORPORATION is an organization situated at tenth road Caloocan City. By leading an organization visit and meetings, the advocates discovered that the organization utilizes a Bundy check in their participation observing and utilizing a manual procedure for the finance. A difficult that is watched utilizing the manual framework is the exercise in futility or the speed of the procedure in every payslip. Another issue is a protected spot for record. From utilized time cards and payslips, the company’s staffs use records for the exchanges. As an answer for this, the advocates proposed an electronic framework to be assessed by Cyclemar. The defenders accept that the automated framework can offer answer for their issues. Through computerization, these observing can be prepared with sped up, since their sheer volume would effectively overpower any manual framework. In building up the framework, the advocates have accumulated the information, programming and equipment prerequisites that are vital for the assessment of the automated framework. Toward the finish of the examination, the defenders anticipate great outcomes toward the finish of the assessment. Theory There is critical distinction between the proposed and the current framework as far as precision, adequacy, unwavering quality, security and speed. Technique The advocates utilized polls for the social occasion of information required in deciding the issues met by the representatives of the Cyclemar Caloocan Corporation. Casual meeting, perceptions and genuine encounters of one of the advocates were additionally remembered for developing the poll. The poll comprised of models that measure the manual framework as far as precision, viability, unwavering quality, security and speed. The primary draft of the poll was submitted to the teacher of the defenders for redresses and recommendations. After the legitimacy and unwavering quality of the poll has been set up, the agents at that point looked for the endorsement of their Professor just as the Manager of the Cyclemar Caloocan Corporation to permit them to lead the examination. After the endorsement of these specialists, the proponents’ directed the surveys. When the study surveys were replied by the respondents, the defenders had assembled before the outcomes were counted for assessment and translation. The representatives of Cyclemar Caloocan Corporation were the respondents of this investigation. In discovering the issues, the workers and ordinary individuals were the wellspring of information. Then again, the workers were the ones to assess the presentation of the current and the proposed framework. Discoveries The discoveries of this investigation are introduced as follows: 1. The advocates discovered that the accompanying highlights ought to be remembered for the proposed framework to structure a framework that can give data storehouse to the Attendance Monitoring and Accounting exchanges in a mechanized configuration, and that is equipped for including, registering, altering, erasing workers, looking through records and producing reports: a. Simple access catches b. Search bars c. Realistic for the interface d. Synopsis/history of the finance exchanges e. Created reports f. Programmed calculation g. Distinctive degree of access h. Mistake messages for wrong information sources I. Rebuilding of database j. Back-up for database k. Easy route keys l. Database for username and secret phrase 2. The advocates discovered that 100% of the representatives accepted that programmed calculation and search bars ought to be remembered for the framework to dispense with the weight in finance exchanges and in looking and recovering employee’s records. Second to the most required highlights for the proposed framework is the programmed calculation where exact outcome will be registered in a brief timeframe. Also the defenders discovered that there is no noteworthy distinction between the proposed and the current framework as far as precision, adequacy, unwavering quality, security and speed. The processed t-estimation of the proposed and existing framework for the most part is more noteworthy than the basic worth; henceforth the invalid theory is dismissed. Ends The defenders reason that the most widely recognized issue of the organization is the speed for which 27% of the workers accepted that the framework is fast or 73% accepted that the current framework causes visit delays in the company’s finance exchanges. In the proposed framework wherein the representatives were the evaluator as far as the five standards expressed over, the number juggling weighted mean of speed increments from 2. 15 or â€Å"fair† in the current framework to 4. 2 or â€Å"excellent† in the proposed framework. It shows that the proposed framework will assist the representatives with handling participation application; reserve funds store exchange, withdrawal of investment funds exchange, credit endorsement exchange, and advance discharge and advance installment in an expedie nt manner. Suggestions Based on the discoveries and end got from this examination, the advocates post the accompanying proposals: 1. The Attendance Monitoring with Payroll arrangement of Cyclemar Caloocan Corporation will be actualized in the organization so the tedious and complex sign in/log-out of the workers will be rearranged and fast. . Advanced marks, for example, scanner tag peruser will be utilized to decide the employee’s character. 3. The finance of the workers in the Accounting area will be remembered for the framework. List of chapters Title Page †¦ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ I Acceptance Sheet†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ii Approval Sheet†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦iii Dedication †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ iv Acknowledgment †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. vi Abstract†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. vii List of Tables†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦xii List of Figures†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. xiv CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND Foundation of the Study1 Organizational Directory 1. Authoritative Chart2 2. Obligations and Responsibility3 Objectives of the Study 10 1. General Objectives10 2. Explicit Objectives10 Significance of the Study11 Scope and Limitation13 Scopeof the Study13 Limitations of the Study13 Definition of Terms 14 CHAPTER IIREVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES Foreign and Local Literature16 Foreign and Local Studies18 Methodology of the Study20 1. Hypothetical Framework22 2. Theoretical Framework24 CHAPTER IIISYSTEM PLANNINGA. Portrayal of the Existing System27 1. Setting Diagram27 2. DFD Diagram28 B. Issue Definition30 1. Issue Description30 2. Foreseen Business Benefits30 3. Framework Capabilities31 C. Undertaking Feasibility32 1. Undertaking Development Cost32 2. Cost †Benefit Analysis33 a. Existing System33 b. Proposed System37 CHAPTER IVSYSTEM ANALYSISA. Data Gathering Tools and Techniques41 1. Questionnaire41 2. Meeting Guide41 B. Depiction of the Proposed System42 C. Framework Requirement Model421. Occasion Table42 2. Setting Diagr

Personal Ethics Statement Essay

My own morals articulation incorporates my qualities and thoughts critical to me as a scholarly and in regular day to day existence. My morals are close to home and characterize who I am as an individual. The choices and decisions I make each day ought to be steady with uprightness and regard toward others. These morals will guarantee any joy and harmony as I hold these qualities. I accept everybody ought to be equivalent. Approaching individuals with deference while considering myself responsible will guarantee I treat individuals as I need to be dealt with. My favored moral len is the ridiculous job either on me or by different implies that I have to give close consideration to my desires for other people. My desires may not be equivalent to other people. I should remember that I can’t control ever circumstance. What's more, that others are fit for settling issues. Confiding in different people’s decisions and choices will help conquer this vulnerable side. My quality remember fearlessness for the essence of deterrents. I can stay away from quick choices and simultaneously face anything troublesome. I esteem companionship and keep close association with individuals I trust. I value the individuals who work along close by and help to empower me. My shortcoming incorporate qualification, mercilessness and disarray. Accepting that I am qualified for extraordinary prividges and convince others. Mercilessness originate from expriece of individuals. I should rehearse care not to be befuddled. Recognizing my shortcoming is significant it considers improvement. My worth characterize me and my conduct or who I am. My conduct likewise influence others seeing someone either easygoing or proficient. The decisions I make and conduct reflect me. My own morals decide my course of activities permitting me to see clear. Investigating and delving profound into my own feelings will permit me to my choice I make. Keeping a transparent heart in all circumstances and rethinking my morals will take into consideration improvement and revisions. I accept these things will assist me with keeping center a nd settle on better choices and improve my life.

Interview Tips from an MIT Educational Counselor

Interview Tips from an MIT Educational Counselor I was an interviewer myself for many years before leading the Educational Council but think it would be helpful for you to hear some advice from a current interviewer named Nikki Springer. Here are some suggestions she has for you as you prepare for your interview: I can’t believe I graduated from MIT 10 years ago! Each time I am lucky enough to be back on campus it immediately feels like home, and I remember my own interview like it was yesterday. I’ve been an EC for six years and have interviewed 50+ applicants in the places work and life have taken me: Bentonville, Arkansas, Springfield, Missouri, Seattle, Shanghai, and New Haven, CT. I’m currently working on a joint MBA/PhD in Environmental Management at Yale and have been the Regional Coordinator for the New Haven, CT area for the past three years. Like most ECs, I LOVE interviewing applicants. It’s a unique and amazing way to stay connected to MIT and the students I meet are inspiring in so many different ways. Everyone at MIT genuinely wants your interview experience to be as low-stress and rewarding as possible, and to that regard, I’ve put together a list of tips for applicants based on interviews I have conducted. Remember that every interview will be unique, and that is what MIT wants, but these suggestions should help to alleviate a bit of nervousness regardless of where, when, and with whom your interview is with. 1. Don’t wait until the last minute to contact us. ECs know that the college application season is a stressful and busy time for applicants and that sometimes it can be hard to find a convenient time and place for your interview which is why the admissions office has deadlines for contacting your EC. While most of the applicants I have interviewed contact me before the deadlines, there is always a small rush of requests right before (or right after) the deadline. It’s in your best interest not to be part of that rush. If circumstances lead you to a last-minute request for an interview, try to be especially flexible in your availability, as your EC also has to scramble to accommodate you and have time to write your report before the application deadline. 2. Be nice in your emails â€" first impressions count. Your EC only has a very limited amount of time to get to know you and make a recommendation about you. This includes the email (or phone) communication to set up the interview. The vast majority of applicants are perfectly nice in their communication, but I’ve had a few experiences with applicants who are curt, demanding, or rude in their emails, or applicants who fail to demonstrate any sort of command of the English language, and I don’t hesitate to include that in my interview report. Remember that part of what ECs look for are NICE people, and this includes people who are nice in their correspondence. This is especially true if you are contacting your EC at the last minute and asking to be quickly accommodated. (See #1) 3. Dress nicely â€" but not too nicely. ECs know that the students we interview are real kids, and that is what we expect. I’ve interviewed students in three-piece suits with their hair slicked back and a briefcase under their arm â€" they look sharp, but overdressed. This is not an interview for a Wall Street bank. I’ve also interviewed students who look like they have just rolled out of bed after a night of too much fun. If you shouldn’t wear it to the grocery store, you shouldn’t wear it to your college interview. It’s perfectly ok to wear the same clothes you wore to school that day, whether that is a uniform with a blazer, your team jersey and sneakers, or jeans and a non-offensive t-shirt. 4. Bring something cool. I always encourage the students I interview to bring something they are proud of to share with me. I have had applicants bring editions of their school newspaper or literary magazines that have articles they have written, laptops to show me websites they have built or movies they have made, engineering projects they are tinkering with when they should be doing homework, and yearbooks that include photos or layouts they have worked on. It often seems to help break the ice when we have something physical to discuss, and it makes you, the applicant, much more memorable to us, especially when we have a number of interviews in a short period of time. If you do bring a “show-and-tell” object, though, make sure you are prepared to talk about it. Being able to present and discuss your work will be a huge and important skill in college and beyond, and presenting something cool to your EC is a great opportunity to practice. Remember that your EC may or may not have any idea about the fields you are most interested in (or they may be an expert!!), so prepare for both scenarios. Being able to explain something to someone outside of your field is critical as you begin applying for grants, fellowships, or pitching projects to clients. We call this the “grandmother test” â€" can you explain your highly technical work to your grandmother in a way that she will understand? Of course, if your grandmother went to MIT than that question takes on a whole new meaning… It certainly isn’t a requirement that you bring anything, but if you have something special to share, I highly recommend it. Note â€" if you are formally submitting artwork or other materials in conjunction with your application, the interview is not a substitute for that. Feel free to bring and/or share these things with your EC, but make sure you also follow instructions from the admissions office about how to officially submit that material. 5. Every interview will be different, and there is no “right” answer. Hopefully you know this already, but ECs don’t have a standard set of questions we ask each applicant. There are no math problems to solve and there is no way to ‘study’ for the interview. Each EC has his/her own style and each interview will have its own vibe. Don’t rely on friends or classmates to tell you what their interview was like â€" yours will be different. Some interviews flow naturally as a conversation, while others take on a more traditional question and answer format. Either is ok and not a judgment on the applicant. If you are asked a series of questions, however, avoid one-word answers â€" the more in-depth and genuine the information you provide us is, the better our report will be. The best way to prepare for an interview is to review the things that YOU want to talk about. I often ask the applicants I interview “What else would you like the admissions office to know about you?” This is a great opportunity for you to fill in and round out your application with information that doesn’t seem to fit elsewhere, but only if you come prepared to share that with us. Make sure you feel confident answering probably the two most common interview questions: (1) Why do you want to go to MIT? And (2) Tell me about yourself. 6. It’s ok to Google us. But not too much. ECs know we are part of the digital world and social media. It’s no surprise that most applicants I interview have Googled me and know a bit about my major, year of graduation, that I completed my master’s at the “other” school in Cambridge, etc. If you can smoothly work in some questions regarding our background, more power to you, but don’t feel the need to compare yourself to us, and don’t dwell on our own backgrounds. However, avoid questions that ask us to directly compare MIT to another institution that we may have attended, regardless of whether or not you may be submitting an application there as well. Also, please refrain from sending us friend requests on Facebook and/or connection requests on Linked In during the application cycle. I’ve known applicants and ECs who have become friends and/or kept in touch for many years, but it’s best to wait until after the application decisions have been made before continuing this relationship. 7. Don’t bring paperwork â€" most ECs take notes. ECs are not supposed to know your grades or test scores, or see recommendation letters from teachers or coaches. Our assessment of your application is to be based only on our interview experience with you. Most ECs will take notes during the interview, and that is to be expected, but please refrain from bringing copies of transcripts, test scores, and the like. Some students bring a small resume/CV with a listing of extra-curricular activities, which is fine (but not required), but please remove any grades or test scores before your interview. 8. Come prepared with questions for us. The interview is really more of a two-way conversation than a formal interview, and we are happy to answer questions from students. Feel free to ask us about the classes we took, how we decided what to major in, where we lived, our activities, if we missed home, etc. Keep in mind that every EC is different and that things at the Institute continue to change, so no two MIT experiences are completely alike, but we wouldn’t be ECs if we didn’t enjoy sharing our own MIT experiences. If you do ask questions, however, make sure they are intelligent ones that show you have done at least a little bit of research on MIT. You don’t need to know everything about the UROP program, for example, but a question like “Are there any opportunities for undergraduates to participate in research?” tells us you have hardly looked at the website. Just like you wouldn’t go to a job interview and ask what the company does, don’t come to your MIT interview and ask overly simplistic questions. Th is is a time for you to help learn whether MIT might be a good fit for you, so help yourself make the most of it. 9. Try not to be too nervous â€" but we understand if you are. Every EC knows that the college application process is a stressful one, and that all applicants are nervous during the interview. It’s ok â€" if you weren’t nervous at all, we would likely think you were either (1) overly confident; or (2) not that interested in MIT. My advice is not to let it get the best of you. If you are asked a question and need a moment to think before you respond, that’s ok. If you start to ramble and realize you are off on a tangent, that’s ok â€" pause for a minute, smile, and start again. I would rather an applicant tell me upfront “I’m really nervous,” than to try to hide it and stammer through the interview. Remember that all ECs, regardless of our age, background, or occupation, are all volunteering to conduct interviews because we believe that MIT is an amazing place and we want to help the next generation of MIT students succeed.